Sakai Does Its Business

I’ve been wondering how Sakai fares among professional schools in the USA, so as a first experiment, I grabbed the top 25 business schools in 2009 as per US News & World Report and did some research.

Given how business schools have the reputation of hewing to proprietary systems and going their own way, I was surprised by Sakai’s strong showing. 3 of the the top 10 business schools use Sakai as their primary online learning system. At least 6 out of the top 25 schools either already use Sakai as their primary system or soon will. I also know that at least 9 other schools in this list are either actively investigating Sakai or have some impetus to adopt Sakai.

I’m still collecting information from a couple of campuses and I welcome your comments. If you know the priamry online learning system for any of the schools not accounted for yet here, leave a comment below or contact me and I’ll update the list.

Online Learning Systems at the Top 25 USA Business Schools

updated 26 January 2010

Institution Location Online Learning System
1. Harvard University Boston, MA  
2. Stanford University Stanford, CA Sakai
3. Northwestern University (Kellogg) Evanston, IL  
4. University of Pennsylvania (Wharton) Philadelphia, PA  
5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Sloan) Cambridge, MA  
6. University of Chicago (Booth) Chicago, IL  
7. University of California-Berkeley (Haas) Berkeley, CA Sakai
8. Dartmouth College (Tuck) Hanover, NH  
9. Columbia University New York, NY  
10. Yale University New Haven, CT Sakai
11. New York University (Stern) New York, NY Blackboard
12. Duke University (Fuqua) Durham, NC Home-grown
13. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (Ross) Ann Arbor, MI Sakai, among others
14. University of California-Los Angeles (Anderson) Los Angeles, CA  
15. Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper) Pittsburgh, PA  
16. University of Virginia (Darden) Charlottesville, VA moving to Sakai Summer 2010
17. Cornell University (Johnson) Ithaca, NY  
18. University of Texas-Austin (McCombs) Austin, TX  
19. Georgetown University (McDonough) Washington, DC  
20. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (Kenan-Flagler) Chapel Hill, NC  
21. University of Southern California (Marshall) Los Angeles, CA  
22. Emory University (Goizueta) Atlanta, GA  
23. Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA Sakai
24. Indiana University-Bloomington (Kelley) Bloomington, IN Mostly Sakai, some Angel
25. Washington University in St. Louis (Olin) St. Louis, MO  

Ranking based on US News & World Report.

Who Is Using Sakai & Moodle

A recent exchange online with colleagues in the Moodle community led me to take another look at the statistics about which institutions are using Moodle in comparison with Sakai. Before you read further, know that I think of Moodle as a sister open-source project to Sakai and would celebrate Moodle’s increased adoption and success just as I would Sakai’s.

Up till now, I’ve always felt publicly available information about who is using Sakai has been inaccurate, erring on the side of undercounting, while Moodle’s published usage statistics have always seemed unbelievably high and in need of a lot of interpretation. Steps are being taken in the Sakai Community to do a better job of reporting who is using Sakai and how, but I would like to see even better information available because I know what we have is not yet complete and accurate.

Taking a new look at Moodle’s statistics: clearly, a lot of people download, install and somehow use Moodle, but I find it hard to distill a realistic picture of enterprise use in educational institutions from the big numbers on display. For example, the two instances on record for UNC Charlotte together have 118,352 users and 40,438 sites! There must be more to that story. Big numbers like that just lead me to question what is really being counted. Moodle publishes how their statistics are generated—and it sounds highly credible—but when I look at the actual stats, I’m still left feeling like I’m not getting an accurate picture that really tells me which institutions are using Moodle and how.

As an experiment, I analyzed the 7,724 US sites shown in the Moodle stats as of 11 Nov 2009. 2,070 are private and are not shown and thus unavailable for analysis—hopefully, real Moodle implementations at .EDU sites are not keeping themselves private, as that would be a disservice to the larger Moodle community. Of the remaining 5,654, I was able to find 574 potentially valid .EDU domains (below). Many of them are clearly not enterprise, higher ed implementations, but are rather departmental, project-based or even K12; others appear to be duplicates. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to comb through this list and extract which are actual enterprise, production implementations of Moodle.

While it may look good for Moodle to have such big numbers, I think potential enterprise adopters would be better served if they could find a credible list of peer institutions who have adopted Moodle as their primary, enterprise online learning platform without having to engage in such involved filtering. I’m working with others in the Sakai community to provide exactly that kind of data to help people connect with peers and generate a more useful picture of Sakai’s use.

US .EDU Moodle Sites

(from Moodle as of 11 Nov 2009)

  1. Accessible Technology Initiative
  2. Achieving Competence Today
  3. ACU Online Course Management Alternative: Moodle
  4. Adelphi Moodle
  5. Admissions Moodle
  6. Alachua County Public Schools
  7. Alaska Pacific University Moodle
  8. Albion College Course Webs
  9. Albion College Discussion Boards
  10. Alliant International University
  11. Alma College Courses Online
  12. American Liberty University
  13. American University Of Health Sciences Virtual College
  14. Anaheim University Online
  15. Anderson University Moodle
  16. Andrew Jackson University
  17. Anywhere School
  18. Aquinas College Course Web Pages
  19. Art Center College of Design | dotEd
  20. Aurora University Online Learning System – Moodle
  21. Bacone Online
  22. Baker – Production
  23. Bakersfield College Online
  24. Baptist Bible College and Graduate School Online
  25. Bastrop ISD Online Learning Center
  26. BCMoodle
  27. Beacon’s Online Learning Portal
  28. Bethany Divinity College and Seminary
  29. Bethany Theological Seminary and Earlham School of Religion Online Courses
  30. Bethel College
  31. Bishop George Ahr High School
  32. Blue Ridge Community College Continuing Education
  33. Blue Ridge Community College Online Learning
  34. Boston Baptist College – Course Management System
  35. bricc.lbhc.edu
  36. Brigham Young University
  37. Brooklyn Techincal High School
  38. BuMathEd.Org (experimental)
  39. BYU Mathematics Department Courses
  40. California State University
  41. Career Technology Center Virtual Classroom
  42. Carl Albert State College
  43. Carrier LMS
  44. CASAT Instructor-Led Distance Learning
  45. CBIS DL
  46. CCC CS Moodle: Online Support for Computer Science Classes@ Contra Costa College
  47. CCLE
  48. CCTC Online
  49. Cedarville Moodle
  50. CEHD Moodle
  51. CEHD Online Courses
  52. CEHHS Demo Moodle
  53. Center for Educational Training & Technology LMS
  54. Center for Veterinary Health Sciences
  55. Central Kitsap School District Moodle Site Ver 1.9.2
  56. Centre College Moodle Pilot
  57. Cerro Coso Community College
  58. Chaminade University of Honolulu
  59. Chapman University MathCS Moodle Site
  60. Charger Learning
  61. Chatham University
  62. Chemistry Diagnostic Test
  63. Chemistry Learning Center
  64. Cherokee High School E-Learning
  65. Christian Brothers University
  66. CICADA
  67. City Vision College
  68. CIU Moodle
  69. Classroom
  70. Classroom Portal
  71. CNS Course Site
  72. COE Portal Moodle
  73. Colgate Moodle
  74. Colgate Moodle
  75. Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School
  76. College Math Prep
  77. College of Education and Health Sciences
  78. College of Education Moodle Server
  79. College of Education Moodle Server
  80. College of Education Moodle Server
  81. Collins Career Center
  82. Columbia College Chicago Moodle Site
  83. Columbia College Chicago Moodle Site
  84. Computer Information Systems
  85. Computer Science At Mount Mercy College
  86. Computer Science Moodle
  87. Computer Science Moodle Site
  88. Computer Science Online!
  89. Computer Systems Moodle
  90. Concord Math/CS Department Moodle Site
  91. Concordia Moodle LMS
  92. “Continuing Education, Pharmacy”
  93. “Continuing Education, Pharmacy”
  94. Continuing Professional Education
  95. Cornell College Moodle
  96. Cornell Cooperative Extension Online Courses
  97. Course Support Materials for laddbc
  98. Courses taught by Prof. George Karypis
  99. Courses.monroe.edu
  100. Courses@Colgate (Courses.Colgate.Edu)
  101. CPCC Moodle
  102. Crab Orchard Elementary
  103. “Craig A. Struble, Ph.D.”
  104. CS Moodle
  105. CSC512 Web Sites
  106. CSE Dropbox
  107. CSU Bakersfield Computer Science Course Site
  108. CSU Monterey Bay Moodle (iLearn)
  109. CTER Course Management System – Illinois
  110. CTER Student Moodle
  111. CTYOnline
  112. CTY’s Parent Forum
  113. Cumberland County Schools-Central Office
  114. CUNY Moodle
  115. CygNET – National University of Health Sciences
  116. Dallas Christian College Online
  117. Dallas Nursing Institute Online Learning System
  118. David Carroll
  119. Davis College E-Learning Site
  120. Dean College
  121. Decatur City Schools Training
  122. Deerfield Academy Moodle
  123. Department of Computer Science – University of West Georgia
  124. DePauw University Moodle
  125. Development – Neurobiology and Behavior Educational Partnership
  126. Devin’s Wonder Symposium of Magical Wonders and Candy Fields
  127. Digital Humanities at UNL
  128. Discovery – Northwest University
  129. Distance Learning at Continuing Education
  130. Distance Learning Center
  131. Dordt College Online Courses
  132. Dr. Walck’s Moodle Site
  133. Drew University Moodle
  134. DRI Computer Based Training Site
  135. Dulap MOODLE
  136. Earlham Moodle 2010
  137. Earlham School of Religion Online Courses
  138. East Los Angeles College
  139. Eastern Michigan University: Professional & Ethics Modules
  140. eCampus: FutureEd4U
  141. eCOW2
  142. ECU Moodle Server
  143. Edinboro University of PA
  144. Edmonds eLearning Project
  145. EDUCATION CONNECTION MOODLE
  146. Educational Psychology
  147. Educational Technology
  148. Educational Technology Masters Cohort
  149. Educational Technology Support Center Courses
  150. Edward Waters College
  151. EIS Moodle 1.6
  152. eLearn @ Loras College
  153. elearning
  154. eLearning – Kilgore College
  155. eLearning at the Monterey Institute
  156. elearning.eduhsd.k12.ca.us
  157. Ellensburg School District – Moodle Server
  158. Elmhurst College
  159. Emerging and Exotic Diseases of Animals & Initial Accreditation Training
  160. Emmanuel Online!
  161. Emmaus e-learning
  162. Emmaus Moodle
  163. ESL @ ISU
  164. ESL Services @ UT Austin
  165. ETI Online Training Center
  166. Executive Development Center e-Learning Community
  167. Exploratorium Moodle
  168. Facultad Online
  169. Faculty Development
  170. Fielding Graduate University’s Moodle site
  171. Flint Hills Technical College Online Courses
  172. Florida Center for Instructional Technology
  173. Florida International University
  174. Florida Tech Computer Sciences
  175. Fox Chapel Area School District Moodle
  176. Franklin College Moodle
  177. Fresno Pacific University Moodle Site
  178. GauchoSpace
  179. Gavilan iLearn
  180. Genealogy.edu
  181. GGE Moodle
  182. GOBC course support
  183. Goshen College Learning Management System
  184. Grace Communion Seminary
  185. Graduate School of Education and Information Studies
  186. Graduate Theological Union
  187. Guilford College Moodle
  188. Guilford Technical Community College
  189. GVSU Statistics
  190. Hartwick College Modern and Classical Langauges
  191. Haywood Community College
  192. Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center
  193. Health Services Courses and Workshops
  194. HEBLearning
  195. HMI Courses
  196. Homestead Elementary School
  197. Hood Theological Seminary Moodle
  198. Hope College Psychology Course Sites
  199. HSU Moodle
  200. HTIC Elearning
  201. http://vle.subr.edu/moodle
  202. Humboldt State University Moodle
  203. Huntington College of Health Sciences
  204. IALC Moodle
  205. ICON: Iliff Community Network
  206. iLearn@MPC
  207. Illinois College
  208. Illinois Wesleyan University
  209. IMSA Online Teaching & Learning Environment
  210. Increasing Patient Access to Pain Medicines around the World: A Framework to Improve National Policies that Govern Drug Distribution
  211. insideCatlin Moodle
  212. Iowa State University College of Human Sciences
  213. Iowa State University English Department Courses
  214. Iowa State University Extension Courses
  215. IR Toolbox
  216. Isothermal Community College (The Learning College)
  217. ISUComm Courses
  218. ITA
  219. ITLS @ USU – Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences
  220. IVE Course Management System
  221. Jack Baskin School of Engineering
  222. Jackson Community College
  223. JCSU Moodle
  224. JFK University
  225. JHU Center for Talented Youth Staff Information
  226. Juniata College Moodle
  227. Kalamazoo College Guilds
  228. Kalamazoo College Moodle
  229. Kamehameha Schools Hawaii Campus eClassroom
  230. KCAI Moodle
  231. Kepler College Coursesite
  232. Keuka College Courses
  233. Keuka Online
  234. Kilgore College
  235. “Klaus Brandl, Ph.D.”
  236. KMSD Moodle
  237. Knox College Moodle
  238. KSC Vietnam Field Study Summer 2009
  239. Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa Community College
  240. Lake Forest College Course Moodle
  241. Lake Forest College Moodle
  242. Lambuth University
  243. Lancaster Bible College and Graduate School – PRODUCTION
  244. Landmark College Institute for Research and Training
  245. LATTC Moodle Server
  246. LCA Moodle
  247. Learning with and about technology
  248. Learning with and about technology
  249. Learning@BGU
  250. LearnRightNow
  251. Levelland ISD Web Campus
  252. Lewis & Clark College Moodle
  253. Lewis & Clark College Moodle
  254. Linn-Benton Community College eLearning
  255. Los Angeles Mission College
  256. Los Angeles Southwest College Online
  257. LSU Health Sciences Center Moodle
  258. Lubbock Christian University
  259. Luther College KATIE Learning Management System
  260. Lyceum
  261. Maharishi University of Managment
  262. Manzano Cluster Intranet
  263. Manzano HS Classroom Connection
  264. Manzano HS Classroom Connection
  265. Marina High School
  266. Marywood University Moodle
  267. Math Center
  268. MC Moodle
  269. MCCSC Moodle
  270. McKinley College
  271. Mercyhurst Moodle
  272. Messenger Online
  273. Messiah College Moodle
  274. MHS Cluster Family Connection
  275. MHS Cluster Family Connection
  276. MIAD Course Management
  277. Mid Michigan Community College
  278. MidSOUTH
  279. “Mildred Elley College (Albany, NY and Pittsfield, MA)”
  280. Missouri Valley College – Moodle
  281. MKO Course Site
  282. MLC/WELS Online Learning
  283. Montreat College Online
  284. Montreat College Online
  285. Moodle
  286. Moodle @ Bethany College
  287. Moodle @ Coe
  288. Moodle @ Coe
  289. Moodle @ East Carolina University
  290. Moodle @ Fuller
  291. Moodle @ Jacksonville College
  292. Moodle @ Lawrence University
  293. Moodle @ Rhodes
  294. Moodle @ RMCC
  295. Moodle @ The Dwight School
  296. Moodle @ Tougaloo College
  297. Moodle @ UVa-Wise
  298. Moodle at D’Youville College
  299. Moodle at Kalamazoo College
  300. Moodle at Lane Community College
  301. Moodle at Montclair State University
  302. Moodle at NJIT
  303. Moodle at OIT – Open Source Course Management Software
  304. Moodle at the ELI
  305. Moodle CMS at WV State
  306. Moodle Community at George Fox
  307. Moodle EDTC
  308. Moodle for courses instructed by Dr. Gray
  309. Moodle for ISI Networking classes
  310. Moodle for TAMUCC
  311. Moodle on Chaucer
  312. Moodle One
  313. Moodle University of Washington
  314. moodle.bard.edu
  315. moodle.hccs.hunter.cuny.edu
  316. moodle.macalester 2004-2005 Archive
  317. moodle.macalester Spring 2006
  318. moodle.ncssm.edu
  319. moodle.nl.northweststate.edu
  320. moodle.nts.edu
  321. moodle.oxy
  322. moodle.ucx.ucr.edu
  323. moodle.wittenberg.edu
  324. moodle@CACC
  325. Moodle@Learning Technologies
  326. Moodle@PhilaU
  327. Moodle4Me
  328. moodlearchive.macalester Fall 2005 Archive
  329. MOODLE–SNU’s Online Course Management System
  330. Moss Landing Marine Labs Moodle
  331. Mrs. Liu’s Site
  332. MSUM Fall 2009 Moodle installation
  333. mtest.ucx.ucr.edu
  334. Multnomah Biblical Seminary :: Connect
  335. My Moodle – Wake Technical Community College
  336. MyCBIT LMS
  337. myCourses @ Louisiana State University – Eunice
  338. Nami Group
  339. National School Lunch Program Refresher Module
  340. Native Eyes Indigenous Studies Online
  341. nbep
  342. NC Testing Program Moodle
  343. NCNM Continuing Education
  344. NCSA Education Moodle
  345. NDNU LMS
  346. Nebo School District Moodle Server
  347. Nebraska Christian College Online
  348. Neumont University LMS
  349. Neurobiology and Behavior Educational Partnership
  350. Neurobiology and Behavior Educational Partnership
  351. New York Theological Seminary Online Learning System
  352. Newbury College
  353. NJ Transit Training
  354. NMT Distance Education
  355. North Cumberland Elementary
  356. Northeast Technology Center
  357. Northern Seminary
  358. Northwest AHEC
  359. Northwest Christian University
  360. Northwest Indian College Moodle Site
  361. Northwest University Discovery
  362. Northwestern College CourseSites
  363. Northwestern Michigan College
  364. NSCC Computer Science and Engineering Site
  365. NUoodle of Norwich University
  366. NWHSU Moodle
  367. OBI Online
  368. OCC Moodle
  369. Oglala Lakota College
  370. Ohio State Department of Mathematics Course Pages
  371. Oklahoma Wesleyan University
  372. Olympia Regional Learning Academy
  373. Olympic ESD Moodle Server
  374. Online @ University of Dubuque
  375. Online Communication Courses
  376. Online Education @ RCC
  377. onlineNTID
  378. Open Source College Administrator
  379. OtterMoodle
  380. Passion University eLearning
  381. PICCLE: A Forum for International Discussions
  382. PICCLE: A Forum for International Discussions
  383. Pierce Mortuary College
  384. Pine View Elementary School
  385. Pitt CE
  386. Pitt Community College
  387. Portal@USCB
  388. Porter-Gaud Moodle
  389. Posner-Keele Cognitive Labs Experiment Scheduling System
  390. PPDC Act 48 Professional Development Center
  391. Prescott College Learning Management System
  392. Project ACCESS Community of Practice
  393. Projects
  394. ProjectStretch.gc.cuny.edu
  395. PROWL- CC’s Platform and Repository for On-line and Web-based Learning
  396. PTI Training
  397. QCC Center for Continuing Education
  398. Quant Moodle
  399. Quincy University
  400. Race and Gender Conscious Remedies
  401. Radford University Moodle Server
  402. Ramapo College
  403. RCE Online – Localization
  404. Reading Academy
  405. Red Cross
  406. Renaissance School of Therapeutic Massage
  407. Rhetorica Moodle
  408. Riverdale Country School Moodle
  409. RWC Moodle
  410. S.C. Professional Development Consortium
  411. Safety on the Internet
  412. Sage Online
  413. Saint Martin’s University Moodle
  414. San Francisco Art Institute
  415. Sauk Valley Community College
  416. SBCC Online College
  417. SCC Computer Careers Moodle Server
  418. SCE Moodle
  419. School Nutrition Toolbox
  420. School of Business Reseach
  421. School of Health Information Sciences
  422. SDI Online
  423. SDSC Education Data Portal
  424. SDSC Online Training
  425. Seattle Pacific University – Moodle
  426. SEBTS Moodle
  427. Sierra College Computer Science
  428. Sinte Gleska University Moodle Learning Site
  429. Sioux Falls Seminary Contextual Learning
  430. Skidmore College Moodle
  431. Smith College’s Moodle
  432. Smith College’s Moodle
  433. Soil Science Courses
  434. South Kitsap School District
  435. South Piedmont Community College
  436. South Texas College of Law Online courses
  437. Southeast Arkansas College
  438. Southeastern Free Will Baptist College Center for Online Studies
  439. Southwestern CC Moodle – Curriculum
  440. Southwestern Community College Continuing Education Moodle
  441. SSC Moodle
  442. ST JOHN’S SEMINARY
  443. St Vladimir’s Seminary E-Campus
  444. St. Augustine College E-learning
  445. St. Catherine University: Moodle
  446. St. Mary’s College Moodle
  447. St. Mary’s University Course Management System
  448. St. Norbert College
  449. St. Norbert College
  450. St. Olaf College Moodle Server
  451. St. Olaf College Moodle Server
  452. Stone Memorial High School
  453. Strategic Open Source At CIS SAC Moodle
  454. Students of the Global Information Internship Program
  455. SU College of Technology Moodle Server
  456. Subject & Course Guides
  457. SUNY Oneonta – Moodle
  458. SVC Web-based Course Resource Center
  459. SVSU – Online Learning
  460. Sweet Briar College
  461. TeacherTECH Community Portal
  462. Teaching English as a Second Language/Applied Linguistics at ISU
  463. test for moodle
  464. Testing Suite
  465. Texarkana College Online
  466. The Agora
  467. The Browning School
  468. The Browning School Parents Association
  469. The Center for Child and Family Studies Online Training
  470. The City College of the Arts
  471. The College of Idaho Moodle
  472. The COMET Virtual Classroom
  473. The Personal Learning Center
  474. The South Hills School of Business & Technology
  475. The UW MEBI Online Course Management System
  476. Thomas Krichel’s moodle at LIU
  477. Thunderbird Learning Environment
  478. TJNHS
  479. TLEARN – Trinity University Moodle Site
  480. TMCC Partnership Moodle
  481. TnTech Computer Science / Web Design Moodle Portal
  482. Toccoa Falls College Online
  483. Transylvania University Moodle Server
  484. Trinity Christian College
  485. Trinity International University
  486. Trinity Online Learning Center
  487. Truckee Meadows Community College
  488. TSTC Moodle Help
  489. UAA Instructional Design Resources
  490. UAB School of Public Health Moodle
  491. UC Davis – Language Learning Center
  492. UCAR Education and Outreach Online Courses
  493. UCCS Moodle
  494. UCLA CCLE – test
  495. UCLA CCLE Moodle
  496. UCLA CCLE Moodle – Archived Sites
  497. UCLA Department of Statistics Collaborative Learning Portal
  498. UCLA Engineering Science Corps Outreach Program
  499. UCLA Physics & Astronomy
  500. UCLA Physics & Astronomy
  501. UCSB ID Moodle
  502. UCSB Music Project
  503. UCSF Collaborative Learning Environment
  504. UF College of Education Online
  505. UIUC Life Sciences
  506. UIUC Life Sciences
  507. ULM Moodle
  508. UMaine College Of Education and Human Development Moodle
  509. UMCES Moodle Courseware Server
  510. Umpqua Moodle
  511. UNCC Moodle
  512. UNCC Moodle
  513. Unet – Moodle
  514. UNH Cooperative Extension – eLearning
  515. Union at Catholic Theological Union
  516. Union College Course Management System
  517. United States Sports Academy
  518. Univeristy of Tennessee Center for Executive Education
  519. UNIVERSIDAD POLIT
  520. University of Louisiana at Lafayette – Moodle LMS
  521. University of New Mexico
  522. University of Philosophical Research On-line Campus
  523. University of Philosophical Research On-line Campus
  524. University of Philosophical Research On-line Campus
  525. University of St. Mary of the Lake/Mundelein Seminary Courses Online
  526. University of Texas at San Antonio
  527. University of Texas at San Antonio
  528. “University of Washington, Tacoma Moodle Server”
  529. University of Wisconsin Department of Mathematics
  530. University of Wisconsin Department of Mathematics
  531. UNLV COE Courses
  532. UNLV Computer Science
  533. UNO Moodle
  534. UPS Moodle Courses
  535. UR Math Moodle
  536. URMoodle
  537. USF Department of Computer Science
  538. USU Mild Moderate Distance Community
  539. UT Extension Online: Certifications
  540. “UV Open – Open Educational Resources, OpenCourseWare”
  541. UW Madison Agronomy Web Courseware
  542. UW Math Moodle Test Site
  543. UWT Institute of Technology Moodle
  544. Vance Granville – Continuing Education
  545. Vance-Granville Moodle
  546. Vanguard University
  547. Vanguard University
  548. Virginia International University
  549. VT – ESIH Moodle Site
  550. W&J Moodle
  551. Waldorf College Course Management
  552. Walla Walla University
  553. Warden Schools Moodle Site
  554. Warner University
  555. Warren Wilson College Online Classrooms
  556. WDT Online
  557. Weatherford College Workforce & Continuing Education Online Courses
  558. WebIT: Online Instructional Technology
  559. Welcome to the iCollaboratory
  560. West Shore Community College – Moodle
  561. Wharton County Junior College
  562. Whatcom Community College Access
  563. Whittier College Moodle
  564. Wilkes Mathematics and Computer Science
  565. Wilkes University
  566. Winsor Moodle
  567. woodle
  568. Woodward Academy
  569. WOSC Portal
  570. WOSC Portal
  571. WPC Online Learning
  572. Writing Assessment System
  573. WWU NSF ILN Moodle Site
  574. yurimi’s courses

Sakai 3’s Commonplace Destiny

I’ve recently been enjoying some (possibly) healthy, irreverent debate with colleagues at Blackboard and beyond about some of the differences between such proprietary regimes and the open-source community of Sakai. While the Twitter channel we’ve been using generates plenty of pithy ripostes, at times a tweet calls out for more sustained thought and response.

A recent tweet from @georgekroner—one of my favorite Blackboarders—set me thinking and led to some longer—if not deeper—reflections, likely to be far less entertaining than the short salvos in our ongoing snarkument on Twitter.

The tweet that set me off was George sharing his concern that Sakai 3’s planned capabilities might be “commonplace” by the time it is ready for widespread use.

I’m not entirely convinced George’s concern is for real, given that Sakai is one of the most significant challenges to Blackboard’s market dominance in learning technologies and it would seem any failure on Sakai’s part would be cause for celebration rather concern over at Blackboard. But maybe George is just the kind of guy who wishes the best for everyone. Or maybe it’s part of Blackboard’s continued posture that having a near monopoly in the proprietary market is fine as long as there is at least one viable open-source alternative like Sakai, even while Blackboard itself acts like open source can’t really compete.

But I’m not inspired here just to wipe away Blackboard’s crocodile tears. George’s tweet started me thinking: if he is right, and the kind of experience Sakai 3 will offer becomes commonplace, we should all celebrate rather than wring our hands.

If Sakai 3 ends up fitting within the broader scope of contemporary online experience, that means Sakai 3’s open, social, user-centered, integrative paradigm shares in broader understandings of what online experience should be—both within education and beyond. It wouldn’t just mean Sakai 3 “guessed right,” it would also mean a very healthy, widespread vision of what the web can and should be has won out. Far from a concern, I would count Sakai 3’s capabilities becoming “commonplace” as a major success, not only for Sakai, but for the web in general.

George was so kind as to provide some examples that illustrate his observation that technology is headed in the same general direction as Sakai 3. Here’s George’s short list:

The question I asked myself after reading George’s list is whether the widespread use of any of these tools (or others like them) would really make Sakai—or other integrated learning platforms—obsolete or unnecessary or uninteresting—in other words, “commonplace.” I and others have taken up this point before and in the end, I still land in the same place. I think educational institutions will want and need to supply a local platform that enables things like a common user experience, integration, authentication, identity management, and more. I would assume Blackboard also holds this view. At the same time, I agree with George’s thinking (but not his concern) that the best of these local platforms will follow Sakai 3’s model, and often integrate other tools, enable collaboration and social networking, open their APIs, be delivered via devices not yet invented, and so on. Last but not least, I still think the educational community itself is the best engine for the development of the tools specific to its core mission, like teaching, learning, and research.

In the first category from George’s list, Google’s Sidewiki stands alone as an example of what we might call an independent, “web 2.0” tool that provides some specific functionality that might be used in conjunction with a variety of other tools. There are way too many great examples of such tools to list here, from social bookmarking tools like Delicious to web conferencing tools like DimDim. I don’t think any of these tools alone could stand in for a full learning platform, but any might be used to extend a learning platform, or be cobbled together with a number of complementary tools to approximate an integrated learning platform (earlier, I attempted an instructive, but ultimately unsatisfying, experiment of this nature using Ning at EDU Next).

Sakai 3 will provide the perfect platform to integrate these kinds of tools, from user treats like Sidewiki all the way down the stack to important glue like Apache Jackrabbit. The community designing Sakai 3 is highly conscious of where the boundaries should be drawn: where Sakai should provide native functionality, where it should leverage already existing tools, and where it should leave things open for integration (ie, pretty much everywhere).

The second category in George’s list includes Atlassian’s Confluence wiki and Jive’s social business suite (headquartered right here in our own PDX!). Both are examples of more fulsome systems designed primarily for business that one might see as approximating the capabilities of a learning platform (along with similar examples like Microsoft Sharepoint). Yet one crucial difference separates these business systems from learning platforms like Sakai, Moodle, Desire2Learn, a host of others, and—one would hope, Blackboard itself: namely, none of these systems is designed primarily for education.

One could argue (and I would agree) that education is a lifelong process and that all these systems are tending toward worthy common practices to support it that incorporate capabilities such as user-centered experience, collaboration, integrative mash-ups, and social networking. However in the Sakai community, we believe strongly that our work benefits from our clear, primary focus on education. It may be that from Blackboard’s proprietary, corporate viewpoint, it is harder to tell the difference between their products and these systems designed primarily for business use. We don’t have that concern about our work within Sakai.

The last category in George’s examples is represented by OpenSocial. Not just a tool or platform, OpenSocial represents a more general technology, standard or protocol which any or all of the other examples above might incorporate. We expect to see Sakai 3 integrate OpenSocial along with other such standards and protocols that make sense, just as we have seen in Sakai 2. Examples would include other parts of the open stack (eg, OpenID, OAuth, PoCo, etc), JSR, IMS, and others too. The existence of something like OpenSocial doesn’t obviate the value of an integrated, open source learning platform like Sakai, built by education, for education, any more than it suggests the obsolescence of a proprietary system like Blackboard. Quite the opposite: Sakai’s open platform and community provide an ideal use case for technologies like OpenSocial that cut across systems, opening up, rather than closing down possibilities for integration and creative use.

I thank George for the inspiring tweet and thoughtful list. It helped me turn concern into even greater assurance that Sakai 3 is headed in the right direction.

Addendum: for the full context of the tweets that inspired this post, see below:

@nicolamj tweeted:
@georgekroner I think the idea is that Sakai 3 will be a generation beyond *any* LMS…

@georgekroner tweeted:
@nicolamj Sakai 3 looks great, but my concern is that by the time it is launched what now seems beyond will then be commonplace

@xolotl (that’s me) tweeted:
@georgekroner you suggest planned Sakai 3 capabilities will soon be commonplace. Examples? (cc @nicolamj)

@georgekroner tweeted:
@xolotl @nicolamj re: Sakai 3 concepts http://bit.ly/2LVDnf http://bit.ly/19vzgi http://bit.ly/xwlY http://bit.ly/DE98 http://bit.ly/1HQW5u

Community Source Evaluation Strategies: Why Commercial Support Is Key

Josh Baron, Director of Academic Technology and eLearning at Marist College and now the new Sakai Foundation Board Chair, recently posted a great article in Campus Technology detailing Marist’s nuanced evaluation of Sakai and its community source provenance: Community Source Evaluation Strategies: Is Sakai Right for Your Institution? The article is a must-read for anyone at an institution considering the adoption of a learning environment—open/community source or proprietary—as all of Josh’s lessons pertain to both options.

I’m especially glad to see Josh include “Functionality Requirements” as only one of Marist’s five important evaluation criteria categories, putting it alongside Support Requirements, Community Health, Reliability/Scalability, and Innovation Drivers. All too often I’ve see institutions focus primarily on functional requirements in their technology choices, often at the expense of wise, strategic decisions that Marist’s other categories take into account. Every system will leave you with functional gaps…it’s the other stuff that will matter most in the end.

Reading through Josh’s piece, I was also struck by how the structures of commercial support for open/community source underlie each of Marist’s evaluation categories, and how well Sakai’s robust commercial ecosystem helps buttress Marist’s case for choosing Sakai. I’ll briefly cover each category below.

Functionality Requirements

Josh points out that Sakai’s functional gaps outlined in Marist’s original evaluation were closed more quickly than expected. Many of the other points in the article explain why innovation and quality move faster in open/community source, filling in functional gaps in record time. The commercial support ecosystem in the Sakai community plays a key role in that process, adding their part to the staggering rate of innovation in the overall community. Commercial firms engage in productive partnerships with learning institutions—like the one between Marist and my employer rSmart that fostered Sakai’s support for the IBM technology stack, or that between Oracle and Unicon that brought us Sakora—and at the same time provide dedicated development resources that harness the collective needs of many clients to push Sakai’s functional breadth and depth.

Support Requirements

Josh references the Sakai commercial support ecosystem head-on in this section. As he writes:

“As Marist concluded research into this area it became clear that running Sakai was like ‘consuming’ any other enterprise level system and that the myth that new development resources would be needed was just that, a myth.”

While the gist of this statement is dead-on, in my reading, it rings true only when one fills the word “consuming” with its full meaning: as an institution consuming commercial support for their open/community source system just like they would with a proprietary system. Maintaining open/community source technologies without commercial support puts different risks and responsibilities onto an institution that can call for extra resources. With commercial support, an institution is consuming Sakai just like “any other enterprise level system,” without dedicating additional technical resources, and usually at substantially less cost than proprietary systems, thanks at least to not having to pay license fees.

Community Health

Josh is spot on again in describing the necessity to evaluate the viability of the community standing behind open/community source technologies. The community you join will bring you the greatest benefits of your open/community source strategy if it’s healthy. If it’s not, your might as well roll your own or pay the big dollars to a proprietary vendor. One element missing from Josh’s otherwise fulsome community health checklist is the existence of a vibrant commercial ecosystem. Sakai is fortunate to mark well in that category as well, which gives Marist—and all the other institutions who might need it—the commercial structures necessary to support their strategic choice.

Reliability/Scalability

Sakai owes the lion’s share of its enterprise performance quality to the many large learning institutions that run it in production and devote substantial resources to its development. For many institutions though, the community’s promise is not enough. They seek out additional guarantees for Sakai’s performance from commercial providers. In response, commercial providers bring additional focus to Sakai’s quality, reliability and scalability. It is through this focus, for example, that rSmart develops its dependable Sakai CLE distribution, upgrades and patches, and maintains our first-rate quality assurance and support programs, freeing users to focus on the more immediate work of their educational mission.

Innovation Drivers

I laud Marist for taking these important, yet seemingly intangible criteria into account in its selection process. Out of the significant innovation drivers Josh lists, the decoupling of code development and support services in open/community source touches most on the role of the commercial sector. The decoupling Josh describes ensures that Sakai commercial providers focus on delivering outstanding support—because after all, the code is libre and gratis. If a provider doesn’t deliver good support, Sakai’s robust commercial ecosystem allows an institution to move to an alternative provider without the costly consequence of leaving their system behind.

Why Sakai Now

The Sakai community is in a special moment. We are celebrating our continued development of a full-featured, world-class, enterprise collaborative learning environment with the release of Sakai 2.6. At the same time, we are extending our early work on a next-generation Sakai 3 platform that will take us to new levels of sophistication in teaching, learning, collaboration, research, and technology.

Simultaneously, outside the community, big events have had profound effects on us. New paradigms of open education and new political winds provide different opportunities and challenges. Continued litigation and consolidation in the proprietary learning technology ecosystem and drastic budget cuts combine to force us to rethink basic assumptions and well-laid plans.

Many inside and outside Sakai are thinking about how best to meet their needs and plan for the future in this special time. How should we support education online? What learning environment should we adopt? How should we allocate resources between maintenance and innovation? How will we manage transitions from one system to another?

I came away from recent Sakai Boston conference thinking that there are two basic facts now more true than ever:

First, our current circumstances prove that technology decisions are best made following long-term strategic vision, not short-term expedience or purely functional and technical criteria.

And second, the best place to work out the answers to our hard questions is as a part of the Sakai community, that is, within Sakai’s practice that follows a community, open source model.

I come to these conclusions based on the following points that I think any institution considering how to balance their resources and ambitions in this special time should carefully consider.

Sakai is Unique

Unlike any other proprietary or open source learning platform, only Sakai provides structured, open and transparent community and governance, powered by a substantial and growing number of institutions of every shape and size from around the world, coordinated by a formal, nonprofit entity, and including a strong and varied commercial ecosystem. We call this combination “community source” and it is open source, only much more.

There is a lot of depth behind that statement, but the upshot is simple. This unique combination of characteristics means that when you choose Sakai, you choose the path with the least long-term risk for change outside your control.

Spending on Sakai Makes More Sense

Institutions around the world are lowering and/or reallocating costs with open source solutions even while they buy guaranteed commercial support to lower their risk. The best part about the open source model is the new control it gives you over where you spend your money. Build in-house support or buy commercial support with vendor independence. Shift costs from proprietary license fees to staffing and activities that have direct effects on the teaching, learning and research that is your core, educational mission.

Any open source technology with a healthy commercial ecosystem gives you these cost advantages, but when I look at the open source online learning landscape right now, I think Sakai has the most robust and varied commercial support offerings, following a model that will enable the healthiest growth.

Sakai Aligns with Your Core Educational Mission

The Sakai community often uses the phrase “by educators, for educators.” It can come across as a marketing slogan, but it conveys a basic truth at the heart of Sakai. When you join the Sakai community, you are taking a huge step toward practices that should be a top priority at every educational organization: aligning your technology strategy with your educational mission. Proprietary technologies may serve educational needs, but their development and distribution are always refracted through the lens of corporate control and profit. Fully aligning your technology strategy with your educational mission is a bigger project than adopting Sakai, but Sakai can be a great first step in the right direction.

Your Work on Sakai Is (Y)Ours

After participating in Sakai Boston and watching the next week’s tweetstream from the Blackboard World 2009 conference, I was struck by how much the activities of these two—sometimes overlapping—communities look the same. But in the end there is a simple, but very important difference: the energy and resources you put into the Sakai community are not owned or controlled by anyone else. I kept finding myself wishing the vibrant Blackboard community was putting all their energy into work that is not only open to all (much of their work is open), but is also not tied to the destiny and control of Blackboard’s proprietary core. Everything you contribute within the Sakai community stays with you, even as you share it freely with other educators working for the same goals.

Are You Ready for Sakai?

Maybe you think your institution does not have sufficient resources to engage in an open source strategy. Stated plainly: there is no institution that is not ready for Sakai.

First, to clear away the most basic concern: quality commercial providers exist for every service you are used to buying from your proprietary provider, usually at lower costs. Need support? Need hosting? Need services? Get three or more bids from commercial firms with strong track records and pick the best fit. Going open source does not mean going it alone.

Second, if you think your institution won’t have the time or energy to engage in an open source community and glean its benefits, think again. Like what I witnessed around the Blackboard conference, consider your engagement with the communities around your proprietary solutions. Do you attend conferences? Exchange best practices and collaborate with other institutions? Engage with support communities? Give feedback on bugs and functional enhancements? Create training and documentation? Integrate with other technologies? You probably participate more than you think.

Your engagement in an open source community will look much the same as your participation in any proprietary community. In both cases, you decide your level of engagement. The only difference is in open source communities, you share full ownership of the value you help generate. Stop paying to give your energy to someone else’s project!

What Should We Do with Sakai Right Now?

Even though Sakai stands now as a fully-capable enterprise collaboration and learning environment, the primary reasons to choose Sakai have always been strategic rather than purely functional or technical. Right now, at this “special moment,” Sakai’s strategic advantages are even more clear.

If you are considering adopting a new online learning system soon, Sakai 2 is your best choice. Adopting Sakai 2 now brings you all of Sakai’s strategic advantages right away, and enables you to better position your institution to follow Sakai’s future and have real effects on what that future will be. You can upgrade to Sakai 3 in a deliberate way when there is a good match between your institutional readiness and Sakai 3’s development.

If you are already using Sakai 2, you are in good company! The large community that has also adopted Sakai 2 is already outlining a variety of transitional upgrade paths. A common pattern for rolling out Sakai 3 capabilities early is the idea of cohabitation with Sakai 2. For example, you might move to a Sakai 3 instance sooner rather than later, integrated with some Sakai 2 tools that provide capabilities not fully developed in Sakai 3. In other scenarios, you might roll out Sakai 3 functionality first for only select uses, like web-enhanced courses, collaboration, or portfolios. At the same time, there is still a lot of room for innovation on both the Sakai 2 and 3 platforms. For example, take a look at what Sakai developer Zach Thomas says about extensibility in Sakai.

If you are concerned about the overhead of working with both Sakai 2 and 3 at the same time, evaluate where your resources will be most effective and farm out the rest. Maybe you’d like to devote your team to addressing online pedagogy or innovating on Sakai 3’s next-generation technology. Hire out the maintenance of your Sakai 2 implementation. Maybe you’re already stabilized on Sakai 2, but want to provide some Sakai 3 capabilities. Hire out the deployment and integration of Sakai 3 or fund the speedy development of Sakai 3 capabilities you must have. Even working with both versions of Sakai with commercial support, you’re still likely to save money over the cost of an enterprise proprietary system.

Whatever your situation, you will be in the best position by joining the community now and moving from Sakai 2 to 3 later rather than waiting on the sidelines until a full Sakai 3 rollout is feasible at your institution.

Sakai’s New Maturity

Several recent developments signal a promising new level of maturity in the Sakai community and product. The Sakai Foundation (SF) has created two new staff positions that will together enable the SF to better coordinate and communicate our work in Sakai.

Long-time Sakai community member Clay Fenlason is the new Sakai Product Manager. Clay is an excellent choice to coordinate our community’s already successful work to further develop Sakai as a coherent, reliable product with a meaningful roadmap. Pieter Hartsook joins our community as Sakai Communications Manager. I don’t know Pieter well yet, but was impressed by his experience and intelligence at the recent Sakai Boston 2009 conference and expect him to become an enormously valuable participant in our efforts to tell the Sakai story more effectively internally and externally. Read more about these new positions in SF Executive Director (ED) Michael Korcuska’s blog.

This new maturity is further demonstrated by the formation of a community-based Sakai Product Council (SPC), which will “ensure exceptional quality and cohesiveness of Sakai product releases in support of varied teaching, research and collaboration needs” in the words of SF ED Michael Korcuska.

I’m honored to be named to the SPC along with key community contributors Noah Botimer, Eli Cochran, Michael Feldstein, David Goodrum, John Lewis, Stephen Marquard, John Norman, and Max Whitney, along with the new Sakai Product Manager, Clay Fenlason. As the SF ED, Michael Korcuska will also serve on the council as a non-voting, ex officio member. You can read more about the formation and ongoing activities of the SPC on the Sakai wiki.

In Boston, the SPC had our second ever and first face-to-face meeting and we began to sketch out some of our attitudes, roles, and processes. There was also significant discussion about the SPC in the product coordination meetings held just before and just after the conference, as well as during the various conference BOFs focused on further defining the shape Sakai 3. It’s still very early, but we appear to have settled on some shared understanding of how we will undertake our charge to shepherd Sakai’s integrity as a product. Here’s my own personal take on some early SPC thinking, but I invite other councilors and the community at large to weigh in and further develop and critique these thoughts.

First, we agree that we share two basic attitudes toward our work on the SPC. We agree to carry out our work and deliberations as publicly and transparently as we can, using existing Sakai community communications channels (primarily the Sakai mailing lists). We also agree that although each of us represents specific constituencies and institutions within the community, as councilors, we will be informed by our specific viewpoints, but attempt as best as we are able to act for the good of the community and product as a whole.

Second, we discussed three basic roles we expect the SPC to play. 1) To consider the coherence and completeness of the whole Sakai product and advise in the formation of the product roadmap. 2) To evaluate the status of new product development projects against characteristics established by the community. 3) To resolve significant issues blocking timely product release.

Third, we began to outline some of the processes we might follow in our evaluation of project status. We agree that the community should shift to work using the product development process already proposed. We see an immediate task to work with the community to define a series of specific characteristics that we will ask projects to demonstrate in order to move to the what the process above calls “Product Development” status in the community product. We expect to collaborate with the community to develop those characteristics using existing models as a starting point (eg, the Sakai tool “scorecard”, the portfolio community procedure for feature requests). We expect that projects will produce their own demonstrations that they meet these specific characteristics for community and SPC review. We expect to help provide guidance to projects on how they can develop and demonstrate these specific characteristics.

We also began to outline what role the SPC will play in the Sakai release process, where we will be focused primarily on evaluating the status of new capabilities. We identified that we may have two evaluation processes, one more lightweight, to use when new features are added to existing Sakai capabilities (eg, new features for a Sakai 2 tool already in the product), and another, heavier process, to use when whole new clusters of capabilities are added (eg, a whole new Sakai 2.x tool, everything in Sakai 3). We are thinking that in a given release cycle, the Sakai Product Manager (Clay Fenlason) will be the primary shepherd of new capabilities up to code freeze, ensuring they are considered by the SPC. While from code freeze to formal release, the release/QA/security teams will be the primary shepherds of those new capabilities along with the entire product. During the release process, if the Product Manager and release/QA/security teams agree that an issue is blocking release that can’t be resolved via typical community collaboration, they will then bring the issue to the SPC for resolution.

We understand that we may have to think differently about Sakai 2 and Sakai 3, given their very different architectures and maturity. We also agree that we are open to helping the community shift to different product release practices. For example, there might be a separation between a slimmer, core Sakai product and a number of Sakai extensions that might follow independent release cycles. Any such changes would obviously take place only after full community deliberation.

Last, but not least, we agreed that while we do not necessarily think that the SPC formation process was ideal, we do agree that the outcome was sound. We think the current SPC represents a good balance of different experiences, skills and viewpoints and that we will be able to work together effectively. We agree with our basic outline of structure and governance that it will be best if the community revisits the SPC formation process only after the current SPC shepherds at least one complete product release cycle, so we can establish and evaluate core practices before we make substantial changes.

As a councilor and community member, I look forward to working with all to demonstrate that the SPC, the new SF staff positions, and the new processes we are initiating will indeed combine to raise Sakai to a new level of maturity as a product and as a community.