PDX #powerballVC

26 Sep 2008 By Nate Angell 6 Comments

Based on an idea by @linuxaid, we announce the first PDX Powerball venture capitalist (#powerballVC) group.

Our own Legion of Tech has been nominated as the trusted #powerballVC steward and will receive 10% of any winnings to support their awesome work to grow and nurture the local Portland community through free, educational, community-run technology events.

Anyone who gives/pledges $5 no later than noon tomorrow (ie, 12pm PT Saturday 27 Sep 2008) can join the final draw and I’ll collect your contribution later if necessary. All entrants will split the winnings equally, minus LoT’s share.

I’ll buy the greatest number of random-number tickets possible for the Saturday 27 Sep 2008 OR Lottery Powerball draw. I promise not to buy any other tickets, so any I hold win for all of us.

Pledge either by leaving your comment below (OpenID-enabled!) or tweeting me @xolotl.

Current Powerball Venture Capitalists include:

About Nate Angell

Wandering IQ. Raised by wolves. Friend to cheese. Working to bend the arc of justice. Learn more about my professional and educational history on LinkedIn and on this blog, or if you really want to get to know me, follow me on Twitter.

Comments

boediger says

12 Feb 2009 at 10:56am

Our own Legion of Tech has been nominated as the trusted #powerballVC steward and will receive 10% of any winnings to support their awesome work to grow and nurture the local Portland community through free, educational, community-run technology events.

boediger

Reply
Adron says

27 Sep 2008 at 11:59am

I always wanted to be a venture capitalist.

Reply
Amber Case says

26 Sep 2008 at 9:06pm

This is hilarious. I had to give you lots of crap about it, though. Good job raising an association of venture capitalists. Of course the world needs more of those.

Reply
- Nate says
  
  26 Sep 2008 at 9:23pm
  
  No problem, @caseorganic…I can take it! Thanks for joining the #powerballVCs…
  
  Reply
mettadore says

26 Sep 2008 at 4:51pm

One of my problems is that I truly feel that there is no price high enough to pay for a good joke :) Sign me up. We’ll have to do check by mail or paypal for me, though. Let me know what’s best.2008-09-26 16:51 -0700

Reply
Bill J says

26 Sep 2008 at 4:24pm

I’m in! I will stop by @pdxgreendragon right about 6:00; hopefully I can catch you!

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices

Open Education: Practices

The OEP companion piece to EDUCAUSE's earlier [7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Content](https://hyp.is/mNdoAIgKEeiyXZuF1FfbIw/library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/6/eli7157.pdf) has arrived. While I think it does a good job of summarizing OEP, I'm disheartened to see the piece shaped so clearly from the perspective that OER is the necessary heart or foundation of OEP. From my POV, OER and open-licensing is a key infrastructural component, but is neither necessary nor sufficient in the larger and more important project to "reconceptualize and improve pedagogy and advance authentic, participatory, engaged learning" that this work rightly champions. Why must OEP always rest so heavily on OER? It's as if we have mistaken tactics for goals.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices

Embodying a commitment to learner-driven education, OEP involves students in “active, constructive engagement with [open] content, tools and services in the learning process” in ways designed to help promote learners’ self-management, cre-ativity, and ability to work in teams.

The editorial addition of "[open]" in this quote betrays what seems like an underlying bias in this work: that open educational PRACTICES require and are always based on open educational RESOURCES. Hence the move to changing OEP to "OER-enabled pedagogy" below. I would argue that yes, there is a deep connection between OEP and OER, that OEP benefits from using OER, but that OEP is possible without OER. And unlike, Abruzzi's story, one might just as easily start from an OEP experience and eventually come to use OER as a part of it.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices

OEP provide the architecture and philosophical underpin-ning for fulfilling the promise of using OER to expand collabora-tive, inclusive, accessible, and active learning and related pedagogy.

Again, this makes it seem like OEP is solely an outgrowth of OER, when I would argue that "expanding collaborative, inclusive, accessible, and active learning" is a primary goal that may or may not engage OER.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices

A key tenet is the positioning of the learner as a central, active player in the learning experience.

Agreed. And this tenet is far more important that the copyright status of the materials involved.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices

Going forward, practitioners and researchers envision that the focus around OEP will evolve from a relatively narrow emphasis on development, revising, and distribution of OER to further development of related practices, architectures, principles, and policies

This imagines that current OEP activities are more focused on OER than may in fact be the case.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Content

Open Education: Content

See also @EDUCAUSELI's companion post [7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Practices](https://hyp.is/7rW6CIgIEeiyWtNQoWuChw/library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/7/eli7158.pdf).

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

an institutional rather than a user focus

This is key: Desires to use portfolios in institutional/program assessment practices are part of what has made them cumbersome. Portfolio use in programs that emphasized their value for students and learning have always been the best examples in my opinion (eg, [Portland State](https://www.pdx.edu/unst/our-portfolios), [LaGuardia CC](http://www.eportfolio.lagcc.cuny.edu/), [Clemson](https://www.clemson.edu/academics/programs/eportfolio/)), even if they also use them in institutional/program assessment too.

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

e-portfolios did not become the standard form of assessment as proposed

Agreed, and yet I still believe that portfolios are a powerful part of what some call "authentic" assessment practices.

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

for many students owning their own domain and blog remains a better route to establishing a lifelong digital identity

DoOO is definitely a great goal, especially if it is viewed in part as a portfolio activity, so people use their domains to build up a lifelong portfolio. What seems key is having the right supports in place to help people and institutions reach such goals not only technically, but most importantly, as a set of practices integrated into their personal and institutional workflows.

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

e-portfolios

FWIW, I think the eportfolio community coalesced around not using a hyphen or capital P in the term. Some prefer to just talk about "portfolios", reasoning that the "electronic" part was not a necessary ingredient and probably should be updated to "digital" regardless.

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

What has changed, what remains the same, and what general patterns can be discerned from the past twenty years in the fast-changing field of edtech?

Join me in annotating [@mweller](https://twitter.com/mweller)'s thoughtful exercise at thinking through the last 20 years of edtech. Given Martin's acknowledgements of the caveats of such an exercise, how can we augment this list to tell an even richer story?

Curated by nateangell.

Twenty Years of Edtech

2008: E-Portfolios

My first entry into edtech was in eportfolios, back in 2004 when I was at Portland State University. PSU was probably an early adopter of eportfolios, so 2008 may be the right year to put them in as a wider focus.

Curated by nateangell.

adding missing words by xolotl · Pull Request #40 · LoupDesign/StoryEngine

StoryEngine is way to listen to, support, and create with the people who matter most to an organization or a cause. It can be used to do research, to monitor or evaluate a program, to generate learning, or facilitate grant reporting. StoryEngine is based in-depth interviews that get transformed into stories. These stories are assets — for communications, advocacy, and more — as well as data. Together the stories create larger dataset that can analyzed to surface insights and learning that inform decision-making.

StoryEngine qualitative methodology.

Curated by nateangell.

Supporting Faculty Research with Information Technology

This report provides institutional leaders with a better understanding of the IT experiences and needs of their faculty who engage in research or seek to expand their research capabilities.

EDU research technology needs

Curated by nateangell.

3 Strategies for Overcoming Faculty Resistance to Active Learning Techniques

3 Strategies for Overcoming Faculty Resistance to Active Learning Techniques

short list of good small and medium sized strategies to engage students in active learning

Curated by nateangell.

Bit, Block, Sketch, Build: Bricolage and Educator Learning - Hybrid Pedagogy

Building Blocks

The four building blocks in "architecting educator learning": ignorance, partnerships, open infrastructure, boundary crossing.

Curated by nateangell.

Annotation is now a web standard – Hypothesis

No highlighted text in this annotation.

Got it. Yes, no annotation directly on images yet. Hm, that’s a W3C graphic we repurposed. It must have a transparent background. I’ll see if I can fix that.

Curated by nateangell.

Annotation is now a web standard – Hypothesis

No highlighted text in this annotation.

Sorry, I’m not sure which text you are referring to. Can you point me to where you see blue text on black?

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Content

OER support the practice of open ed-ucation, an umbrella term for the mix of open content, practices, policies, and communities that, properly leveraged, can provide broad access to effective learning opportunities for everyone.

Great to see my earlier comment led to a fix here: "opportunities" now replaces "materials" and it all makes more sense.

Curated by nateangell.

7 Things You Should Know About Open Education: Content

No highlighted text in this annotation.

Thanks Cable! That's super good to know...it would have been less confusing if this plan were clear up front.

Curated by nateangell.