As a part of the work I’ve been doing around opening knowledge practices generally, I’ve been thinking about how one might design open learning experiences that support multiple meanings of “open”: not just using open educational resources (OER), not just enabling open educational pedagogies (OEP), and not just offering wide access (like MOOCs), but all those meanings of open and more. To continue what is a long-standing conversation across the open community, I’ve tried to distill characteristics and levels of open into a rubric that one might use as a guide to designing and/or evaluating open learning experiences.
I know I haven’t managed to capture everything that might be considered in open learning experiences, so I hope we can together revise/extend this starting place to make it even richer. Please comment and contribute! Highlight any text on this page to add Hypothesis annotations, add comments or webmentions below, and/or contact me. I’ll be including all those who contribute in the acknowledgements (unless they prefer to remain unacknowledged).
You can explore public Hypothesis annotations people have made on this document by opening the Hypothesis sidebar at the upper right. You can also explore public annotations on any other document that are tagged with both “OKP” (for Open Knowledge Practices) and “LER” (for Learning Experience Rubric) using Jon Udell’s “facet” utility that enables sophisticated searches of annotations and replies. For example, when I’m reading other resources in the bibliography below and make annotations that I think relate to this rubric, I’m tagging those annotations with both “OKP” and “LER”.
Once the rubric starts to mature, I’d love to consider another step: a collection of learning experiences matched to the rubric. Ideally, we’d just connect to already existing collections of learning experience designs.
Scroll down to see the collaborative bibliography of works related to this topic I’ve started. It’s very sparsely populated so far, but I welcome additional contributions. Let me know if there’s a resource I should add or I’ll gladly add you to the collaborative group I started in Zotero.
This rubric is designed to evaluate open educational learning experiences (eg, assignments, modules, courses, etc). The components of the rubric may seem vague and/or overly general as I have been attempting to make something that can be used in different situations. I’d love to hold up more specific open characteristics, materials, activities, etc to see if the rubric can include them.
The columns are additive: For a learning experience to be Developing, it should also include Emerging characteristics. Transforming experiences should also include Developing and Emerging characteristics.
Please comment and contribute! Highlight text to add Hypothesis annotations, add comments or webmentions below, and/or contact me. I’ll be including all those who contribute in the acknowledgements (unless they prefer to remain unacknowledged).
You can also access a Google Slides version of the rubric that can be downloaded in various other formats, including a PDF suitable for printing.
|Portable skills||Training and practice in required skills are integrated into the experience.||Participants practice skills that would be valuable for them beyond the experience.||Participants apply skills in new situations outside the experience.|
|Renewable work||Participants produce works connected to existing works that have value in the world.||Participants modify and/or add to existing works that have value in the world.||Participants produce new works that have value in the world.|
|Engaging openness||Participants engage with open materials and/or activities (eg, open data, open educational resources, open-source technologies, etc).||Participants apply open practices and/or tools to closed materials and/or activities.||Participants engage directly and productively with new or existing open projects and/or communities.|
|Ensuring inclusivity||Materials and activities support and encourage access and use by diverse participants.||Participants modify/extend materials and activities to enable better access and use within the experience.||Participants modify, extend, and/or promote materials and/or activities to engage communities outside the experience.|
|Exploring roles & relationships||Roles and relationships shared among participants and broader communities are clearly surfaced and discussed.||Participants explore different roles and relationships like learning/teaching, receiving/giving, observing/making, consuming/producing, autonomy/interdependence, freedom/responsibility.||Participants empower themselves and others to take on new roles and relationships outside the experience.|
- Angela Gunder
- Heather Angell
- Nate Angell
- Twyla Angell
Bibliography: Open Learning Experience Design
Resources listed below are items in the larger, public Open Knowledge Practices Zotero group bibliography that appear in the subcollection, Learning Experience Bingo.
Let me know if you have a resource to add to this bibliography or send me your email address if you would like to join the collaborative Zotero group to add and tag resources yourself.
3 thoughts on “OKP Learning Experience Rubric 1.1”
This is awesome. There is so so much to love here. First, the layering of Hypothesis does so much to make the rubric dynamic, which of course it wants to be. I have really pondered the idea of “open assessment” for a long time, and would love to see a revolution in which our assessment tools become as 5R-able as the materials they assess. So I had a bunch of questions inside the rubric, but I think I like the rubric MORE for making me question it in places. But I also love this because it helps draw conversation towards the qualities of our learning experiences outside of content, and I don’t think there are a whole lot of scaffolds for faculty who want to open their pedagogy that really help draw the focus towards how and why and a bit away from WHAT. This is SUCH a cool project. At some point, maybe do a paragraph synopsis and link back to this page and submit to the Open Pedagogy Notebook, too. I’d love to see this in there at some point.
Robin: Thanks for the invite! I submitted this rubric’s descendant, OKP Learning Experience Bingo 2.0, to the Open Pedagogy Notebook.